Litigation / Disputes
Two prompts focused on practical litigation outputs: a short merits position and an action-oriented interim relief plan.
Prompt 3 — Merits Analysis (Force majeure vs hardship)
I act for the Landlord/Property Owner in [Country].
Scenario: A tenant stopped paying rent, claiming “force majeure” due to a general security situation
and reduced customer traffic. The premises are accessible and usable; no physical damage.
Task: Analyze whether decreased revenue/customer traffic can justify withholding rent under typical
contract-law principles in [Country].
Deliverable:
● 6–8 sentence legal position summary (no long doctrine dump).
● 3 strongest arguments for a demand letter rejecting the tenant’s claim.
● 2 facts I should confirm (or evidence to request) to strengthen the landlord’s case.
Prompt 4 — Procedural Strategy (injunction + evidence checklist)
I represent the Claimant in a commercial dispute in [Country], before [Court/Forum].
Context: We have strong evidence the Defendant is transferring assets to affiliates to frustrate
enforcement.
Task:
● Provide a step-by-step strategy to seek urgent interim relief (asset freeze / injunction or local
equivalent).
● Give a practical evidence checklist (10 items max) to support urgency and risk of dissipation.
● Draft a short outline for the supporting affidavit/witness statement (headings only).
Constraints: Be jurisdiction-neutral but use placeholders where procedure differs; keep it concise
and action-oriented.
Follow-up ideas: Ask “What is the weakest link in my urgency showing?” or “Give me a
one-page skeleton argument outline for the hearing.”